Rebuttal to Prof. Vinayak Prasad's rebuttal of Drs. Malone and McCullough on the Joe Rogan podcasts
Prasad is sometimes right and agrees with Malone and McCullough
Prof. Vinayak Prasad of UCSF wrote We need to talk about the vaccines
Background
My son is vaccine injured (not by SHINGRIX). Dr. Malone was injured by the Moderna vaccine.
Robert F Kennedy Jr. predicted and warned the FDA before EUA that PEG-containing mRNA vaccines will cause allergic reactions. He was proved right, immediately following roll-out. Any vaccine that has enough PEG to elicit an allergic reaction, has more than enough PEG to cause sensitization. So billions have now been sensitized to PEG, by the mRNA vaccines.
Dr. Patrick Whelan of UCLA warned the FDA about mRNA vaccines causing cardiac injury, again before EUA. He wrote:
Before any of these vaccines are approved for widespread use in humans, it is important to assess in vaccinated subjects the effects of vaccination on the heart
I warned the FDA about lack of design for safety, again before EUA. Dr. Flack raises similar concerns now.
We were all ignored by the Pharma conflicted FDA/VRBPAC.
So the adverse events we are experiencing with these vaccines are not some unforeseeable, bleeding-edge, medical discoveries but predictable events with mechanisms that have been known, understood and ignored for months/years.
Separately, I predicted and warned the FDA in 2017 about Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cell protein contaminated SHINGRIX vaccine inducing autoimmune diseases. Prof. De Groot predicted the same. Now SHINGRIX has been shown to increase risk of GBS, just as we predicted. And shingles itself is an iatrogenic disease caused by the roll-out of the varicella vaccine.
Prof. Prasad writes
Paul Offit, a prominent vaccine advocate and the director of vaccine communication at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, recently told the Atlantic that he advised his own 20-something son not to get boosted.
It is important to point out that Offit famously told us parents that infants can safely receive 10,000 vaccines a day.
each infant would have the theoretical capacity to respond to about 10 000 vaccines at any one time
Now he recoils at his 20 yo son receiving a 3rd vaccine in 7 months.
Malone alludes to many potential side effects of vaccination, ... seizure and paralysis ... menstrual irregularities ... He suggests that vaccination can suppress T cells, raising the risk of unusual cancers.
To date, I have seen no evidence to support any of these claims
Prof. Prasad should know that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Pfizer themselves have documented transient decrease in lymphocytes following the vaccine. You will find evidence only if the appropriate experiments are performed.
Moderna's SEC filing claims they have tissue-targeted mRNA translation technology using microRNA (miRNA) to limit protein expression to specific type of cells.
All nucleated cells in the body are capable of translating mRNA, resulting in pharmacologic activity in any cell in which mRNA is delivered and translated. To minimize or prevent potential off-target effects, our platform employs technologies that regulate mRNA translation in select cell types. Cells often contain short RNA sequences, called microRNAs or miRNAs, that bind to mRNA to regulate protein translation at the mRNA level. Different cell types have different concentrations of specific microRNAs, in effect giving cells a microRNA signature. microRNA binding directly to mRNA effectively silences or reduces mRNA translation and promotes mRNA degradation. We design microRNA binding sites into the 3’-UTR of our potential mRNA medicines so that if our mRNA is delivered to cells with such microRNAs, it will be minimally translated and rapidly degraded.
Myocarditis, pericarditis induced by the vaccines shows us that miRNA targeting was either not implemented or was a spectacular failure.
The lipid nanoparticles (LNP) can of course be taken up in numerous tissues anywhere in the body just as they are being taken up in cardiomyocytes. With no targeting, when all these tissues express spike proteins, they are all targeted and destroyed by spike-specific CD8+ T cells activated by infection or the vaccine. So any number of organs can be damaged. Where are the studies showing that the vaccine formulation can successfully avoid all these mechanisms of damage?
Formally, this is Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) that is performed on EVERY other safety critical product. Vaccine makers don't do FMEA because there is no product liability.
So you have seen no evidence because they made sure they did not collect or publish any such evidence. Whatever little they collected, the FDA is fighting hard to keep it hidden.
they are irresponsible — Malone’s rhetoric verges on fear-mongering
Actually, is it not irresponsible to ignore these failure modes and inject this experimental vaccine into billions?
Prof. Pulendran is one of the few who honestly admit that we don't have a clue how these vaccines work. If you don't know how they work, you don't know how they fail and hurt people either. Why is it "fear-mongering" to point out the dangers of a vaccine that we have no clue about?
Uncharted territory
“This is the first time RNA vaccines have ever been given to humans, and we have no clue as to how they do what they do: offer 95% protection against COVID-19,” said Pulendran.
Bad things can happen after vaccination, such as heart attack, that are entirely coincidental but that still might be reported.
Steve Kirsch has a great analysis that covers that. And BTW, Steve has been offering $1 million to anyone who can prove him wrong. No takers so far.
they must be weighed against data that shows vaccines reduce a big cause of death
No, that is assuming denial of early treatment. Most deaths are avoidable. And Pfizer's own trial shows the vaccine kills 3 by causing cardiac arrest to potentially prevent one COVID-19 death.
If McCullough wishes to make this case, the best forum would a (sic) scholarly publication
He did. Pharma took it down.
Now we have corroboration from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) and the Department of Defense is attempting to cover that up.
those who get vaccinated after being infected with Covid are at a two-to four-times greater risk of having an adverse reaction to the vaccine;
Why is that surprising? First, infection protects for at least 17 years. So vaccines offer zero benefit. Risk is obviously non-zero. So it is insane to vaccinate the infected. The only reason to do that is Pharma profit. Since you are making CD8+ T cells that recognize spike, following infection, they will attack any cell that displays spike protein. Why is it surprising that you will suffer organ damage including cardiac damage with mRNA vaccines that fail at targeted delivery and cause spike protein expression in just about every part of the body?
misconstrued to mean that infection is preferable to vaccination
Again, you are assuming denial of early treatment.
These are entirely false and insulting allegations
The problem was that when the randomised trial data came in, they suggested the drugs favored by Malone and McCullough were ineffective.
No and no!
The majority of HCQ trials used near fatal doses in seriously ill patients, late in the course of the illness and as you point out they predictably killed patients. High doses used were "justified" based on concentrations required for an "anti-viral" effect while ignoring HCQ's immunomodulatory effects.
The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) warned the WHO about these overdoses.
When dosed appropriately and used early, HCQ works as studies have confirmed.
Numerous studies have shown ivermectin works. The probability that all those studies are wrong is estimated as 1 in 118 billion.
Major Japanese hospitals use ivermectin as standard of care.
Prof. Andrew Hill changed the conclusion of his ivermectin paper after Gates-funded Unitaid forced him to do so.
Dr. Malone was the first to investigate and report on the mechanism by which famotidine helps reduce COVID-19 severity.
Steve's team investigated and reported the benefit of fluvoxamine.
I emailed Fauci, Redfield, Collins and numerous others Feb 1 2020 (that's not a typo) explaining why antihistamines and mast cell stabilizers will help in COVID-19.
Famotidine is an histamine H2 blocker or antihistamine. Fluvoxamine is a mast cell stabilizer. Numerous studies have since shown the benefit of antihistamines, just like I predicted.
So Malone is absolutely right when he said:
“probably half a million excess deaths” have happened in the United States through the intentional blockade of early treatments.
Prasad pointed out how Fauci/Collins/virologists/media attempted to cover up the lab leak. It is the same Fauci/Collins who suppressed cheap HCQ/ivermectin and other early treatments in favor of vaccines and expensive patented drugs that minted pharma billionaires. The lab leak was also dismissed as "entirely false and insulting allegations". Has Prasad considered that he is making that same mistake again by trusting the same people who lied about the lab leak?
Do you demand an RCT for the use of acetaminophen to treat fever/pain during COVID-19?
So why do you demand an RCT for the use of histamine H1/H2 blockers (antihistamines) to treat an allergic reaction during COVID-19?
I correctly predicted and Yale researchers confirmed that COVID-19 severity is an allergic reaction to the virus. How do you treat allergic reactions? Antihistamines and mast cell stabilizers. Just as for acetaminophen, you don't need an RCT to use famotidine, cetirizine or a mast cell stabilizer during COVID-19.
So some treatments for COVID-19 are sitting in your medicine cabinet at home. But the drugs being effective was actively suppressed/denied, to mint Pharma billionaires, at the cost of millions of deaths.
Cardiac injury that occurs due to allergic reactions is Kounis syndrome. Since COVID-19 severity is due to an untreated allergic reaction to the virus, cardiac injury that occurs is due to Kounis syndrome. I notified Prof. Kounis. Kounis' team, Malone's team and I published the details.
Rebuttal to Prof. Vinayak Prasad's rebuttal of Drs. Malone and McCullough on the Joe Rogan podcasts
i was surprised that Prasad didn't seem to know that the menstrual irregularities side effects have been confirmed or at least are being studied. with over 30,000 yellow card reports in the UK, i don't think you can write it off as coincidence
Very interesting stuff. Did not know about antihistamines and a few other details. Thank you for putting this info out for people to see.