Discover more from Vinu’s Newsletter
To prevent one COVID-19 related death, Pfizer admits their vaccine kills at least three people by causing cardiac arrest
This article on the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine trial was published in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Six Month Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine
See Table S4 below.
Common sense dictates that the harms of this vaccine far outweigh the benefits.
The probability of this outcome of 4 cardiac arrests in the vaccine group versus vs. 1 in the placebo group being a chance occurrence, is only 1.5%.
1/22000 in the placebo group is used as background cardiac arrest death rate.
(((21999÷22000)^21996)×((1÷22000)^4)×(22000!))÷(21996!×4!) = 0.0153 or 1.5%.
So we have 98.5% probability that the 3 excess cardiac arrest deaths were CAUSED by the vaccine.
Since regular calculators cannot perform this calculation, you can use WolframAlpha to verify.
We know these vaccines cause myocarditis and pericarditis. The excess cardiac arrest deaths being caused by the vaccines are therefore not surprising at all.
Further, Dr. Patrick Whelan of UCLA warned the FDA BEFORE the EUA about heart injury.
Before any of these vaccines are approved for widespread use in humans, it is important to assess in vaccinated subjects the effects of vaccination on the heart
Now the prediction has come true as reported in the Circulation journal of the American Heart Association.
Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning
We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.
The FDA tried to hide the same type of imbalance for Bell's palsy observed in the trial but were caught.
Therefore, the observed incidence of Bell's palsy in the vaccine arms is between 3·5-times and 7-times higher than would be expected in the general population. This finding signals a potential safety phenomenon and suggests inaccurate reporting of basic epidemiological context to the public.
Polite way of saying "the FDA lied to the public".