15 Comments

Sooo...vaxxed unvaxxed studies aren't even good enough if they follow from birth. Not even form conception. Even parent vaccine exposure before conception could be diluting studies.

Expand full comment

Exactly! That's why epidemiology without understanding mechanisms is bad, misleading.

Epidemiological studies that ignore mechanism of disease causation are flawed and mechanistic evidence demonstrates that vaccines cause autism

https://zenodo.org/records/1117106

Expand full comment

This general issue I have termed "exposure dilution bias". The other major confounding is "confounding by contraindication". This mostly means parents recognize atypical development (or vaccine injury) and cause children to avoid vaccines. This concentrates autism in control groups. I've done some modeling on the combined effects of these two and will surely publish someday. It really needs to be spelled out in black and white to people just how useless the epidemiological studies are. Ironically, and even paradoxically, the more dangerous vaccines are, the less they will look like they cause autism, and may even look like they prevent autism.

Expand full comment

Given the evidence that repeated covid mRNA shots cause IgG4 class switching (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39272189/), are we set up for even more autism?

Expand full comment

The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with milk proteins. So it can definitely cause autism.

As for the IgG4 against spike, I don't know if it can cause autism.

Expand full comment

Seems to be better at just killing people outright

Expand full comment

Peanut, Lactose, Gluten, Egg and Soy allergies are a real thing.

Injecting foreign proteins under our skin can sensitise us to them or worse yet to our own proteins.

Expand full comment

Brilliant. I'm curious what you think about the potential Aluminum link or other proteins used in vaccine development such as eggs.

Expand full comment

Aluminum adjuvant makes allergies/autoimmunity induced by proteins in the vaccine, even worse. With an adjuvant, even trace quantities produce allergic/autoimmune responses. All animal/plant/yeast proteins in vaccines produce autoimmune responses.

Expand full comment

Is it safe to give allergy shots for dust allergy to my 18 yr old son who has autism . He developed GERD when he was 7.5 yrs of age

Expand full comment

"Is it safe to give allergy shots for dust allergy to my 18 yr old son who has autism . He developed GERD when he was 7.5 yrs of age"

Sorry about your son's illness.

Injections are always bad.

Please see if oral version like this is available:

https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-odactra-house-dust-mite-allergies

More details:

https://vinuarumugham.substack.com/p/the-pharma-corrupted-american-association-e1a

Expand full comment

Thank you for the links and information but I could not open Dr Cherie video . Are you aware of this institute in California which cures anaphylactic allergies https://foodallergyinstitute.com/food-allergy-treatment/how-tip-works/, one parent whom I know her daughter got cured .I am in South Carolina so I contacted them to check place they said don’t treat food intolerance only anaphylactic cases

Expand full comment

Autism is a word made up by lawyers so Drs could get paid.

Children born with the characteristics of a New Human.

God's Design where by these children have 12 strands of DNA activated.

We are dinasours... We only have 3 strands of DNA activated.

They communicate by telepathic talents.

They are Gifted with many psychic powers including the ability to see beyond the Veil... In other words, they see dead people. They communicate with them and these children, which are a gift from God, can teach us more about life than we could ever imagine.

WARNING:

IF PARENTS FORCE THESE GIFTED CHILDREN INTO A "NORMAL" CHILDHOOD AND PUNISH THEM FOR NOT SPEAKING OR INTERACTING WITH "NORMAL PEOPLE"

THESE BLESSINGS FROM GOD WILL LEAVE WHEN THEY ARE 18 YEARS OLD.

AND THESE PARENTS WILL NEVER SEE THEIR CHILD AGAIN.

PLEASE STOP ABUSING THESE BEAUTIFUL CHILDREN.

Expand full comment

When was the DNA model “discovered”. 1953? Is it not just a model?

Expand full comment

???

Expand full comment